| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
I'm wondering, who is the one saying that writing book is easier and who is on the other side.
Okay, if I were asked, I would answer writing a code is easier than writing a book. Why? Technically speaking, we can see from the rule of writing. A code, usually is composed of words that are arranged by certain rule. In compiler, we call it grammar. Likely, words in a book of course have to be well arranged so that everybody can understand it. Hence, a book has a grammar too. However, Grammar used to write a book is somehow so ambiguous that not everyone has the same meaning on it. Even worse, a book can be quite cryptic. Not for a code composed of a context free grammar. Everyone will have the same meaning on every single line of code. Once we fully understand the grammar, we can write any code that is unambiguous.
Sometime, I know what is my idea, but I don't know how to express my idea in written form. Hahah, I guess practice makes perfect. Probably writing a book has more available style than writing a code.
How about you?